Skip to main content

Sinking in the Mud (Jeremiah 38)

I was reminded just a week ago that Scripture contains "golden nuggets" if we would spend the time to look into the details.

Here is one discovered just today - Jeremiah being thrown into the cistern.

Background: Jerusalem on the verge of being invaded by Babylon. Jeremiah preaches to King Zedekiah to surrender to Babylon. The King did not take this message well and decides to throw Jeremiah into a waterless cistern filled only with mud.

"So they took Jeremiah and cast him into the cistern of Malchiah, the king's son, which was in the court of the guard, letting Jeremiah down by ropes. And there was no water in the cistern, but only mud, and Jeremiah sank in the mud." (Jer. 38:6)

Jeremiah is then saved by the unlikeliest of sources - Ebed-melech the Ethiopian. Scripture would go on to describe his faithfulness (Jer. 39:15-18)

After Jeremiah is out of the cistern, the King meets with him secretly at the temple (Scripture is oddly specific that this was done at the third entrance). Jeremiah preached the same message that he ought to surrender. Jeremiah then used a very interesting phrase when telling the King about the vision he saw if the King refuses to repent:

"Behold, all the women left in the house of the king of Judah were being led out to the officials of the king of Babylon and were saying,

“‘Your trusted friends have deceived you
    and prevailed against you;
now that your feet are sunk in the mud,
    they turn away from you.’ (Jer. 38:22)

There is more. Jeremiah's message that those who have surrendered will have their "life as a prize of war, and live." (Jer. 38:2)

We see then, these words in Jer. 39 regarding Ebed-melect the Ethiopian who saved Jeremiah.

"For I will surely save you, and you shall not fall by the sword, but you shall have your life as a prize of war, because you have put your trust in me, declares the Lord.’” (Jer. 39:18)

--

I am not sure how to apply these yet. The idea for example that Zedekiah suffers his own punishment is definitely possible - but may be too simplistic as an application (Christians vs their enemies, i.e. the devil).

An even more farfetched one, considering how we like Zedekiah are sinful beyond measure, should we also anticipate an unlikely Saviour out of the mud if we turn and repent?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The use of Psalm 68:18 in Ephesians 4:8

  For Paul in Ephesians 4:8, clearly there are some changes from the text that Paul is supposedly citing which is Psalm 68:18. Comparing Psalm 68:18 and Ephesians 4:8, it is obvious there are differences. I believe Paul was actually using the LXX but has changed its words for the occasion in Ephesians 4. The LXX version of Psalm 68:18 and Ephesians 4:8 differs by a few words: Psalm 68:18 (it is actually Psalm 67:19 in the LXX): ἀναβὰς εἰς ὕψος  ᾐχμαλώτευσας  αἰχμαλωσίαν, ἔλαβες  δόματα  ἐν ἀνθρώπῳ , Ephesians 4:8 ἀναβὰς εἰς ὕψος  ᾐχμαλώτευσεν  αἰχμαλωσίαν,* ⸆  ἔδωκεν  δόματα ⸀ τοῖς ἀνθρώποις. Structurally you can see the LXX and Eph 4 is similar but for a few words changes.   The first change is from 2nd person (LXX) to 3rd person (Eph 4) with regards to who is doing the ascending in the first line.  So the English Bible rightly translates the phrase to "When  he  ascended on high" versus Psalm 68, " you  ascended" ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Paul and the Epicurean and Stoic Philosophers in Acts 17

Now while Paul was waiting for them at Athens, his spirit was provoked within him as he saw that the city was full of idols. So he reasoned in the synagogue with the Jews and the devout persons, and in the marketplace every day with those who happened to be there. Some of the Epicurean and Stoic philosophers also conversed with him. And some said, “What does this babbler wish to say?” Others said, “He seems to be a preacher of foreign divinities”—because he was preaching Jesus and the resurrection. And they took him and brought him to the Areopagus, saying, “May we know what this new teaching is that you are presenting? For you bring some strange things to our ears. We wish to know therefore what these things mean.” Now all the Athenians and the foreigners who lived there would spend their time in nothing except telling or hearing something new. (Acts 17:16-21) (1) Christianity is meaningless to a person if it is classified as simply another school of thought, like the Epicureans or...
Post a Comment
Read more

Lot, Noah, Shem, the Fall - how they all combine together

In this short writing, an attempt is made to show how the accounts of Noah, Shem, Lot, as well as the events after the Fall serve to powerfully combine to reveal the character of God in those who obey Him and those that do not.  The stories of Noah and Lot seem disparate but the parallels are incredible. The first connection is the feature of “wine” in both of these accounts. The parallels follow the pattern of (A) God’s salvation act (B) The drinking of wine (C) Actions of the Children.  It is easier to see the parallels when they are juxtaposed side-by-side (see picture). The (C) parallel may be harder to observe. Lot’s daughters’ attempts to bear children by their father is in fact the “uncovering of nakedness” prohibited later in the Pentateuch in Leviticus 18:6 -20. The verse below suffices for us to develop our thoughts further: “None of you shall approach any one of his close relatives to uncover nakedness. I am the Lord.” (Lev. 18:6) This ties back to the F...
Post a Comment
Read more