Skip to main content

On the subject that Christians are no different from Epicureans in seeking pleasure

On the subject that Christians are no different from Epicureans in seeking pleasure, differing only in the choice of activities that one chooses to partake


You are right on one point in that we are all beings of pleasure. But to the Christian, God Himself is the pleasure not so much the Christian activities that grant us that (although a Christian should find the community of believers and the preaching of the Word pleasurable). The words from the Psalms are written in this form - "Oh taste and see that the Lord is good" (Psalm 34:8). The use of the language which are usually associated to the partaking of food is deliberate for us to understand this. The invitation is to taste God and his goodness.

I do not mean exactly that the Epicurean acts are futile. It is healthy for Christians to thank God for everything we have been given from music, to food, to the gift of friendships and so on. So in this we share similarities with the Epicurean. The best way of explaining this is that at one point in our childhood, our toys were our everything. But we no longer derive the same pleasure that we used to.

It is the same with God. The knowledge of Him dwarfs out every other pleasure source. You may not agree with this but I suggest two things that points towards this - the first being that one never feels fully satiated on this earth with regards to the good things that we have. All the football, music, arts, travel, and relationships are pleasure giving but never satiates fully.

The second is a bit more counter-intuitive but it is worth asking this question: how did we come to be pleasure seekers in the first place? It presupposes a lot of things. I would suggest we were built for this.

On the matter of the adoption of the Christian religion - this is a subject matter that I have a lot to say but in the interest of brevity, I will simply describe it as such. Nobody actually chooses on their own accord to be a Christian. Theologically speaking, God Himself draws each and everyone out of their own prodigality and make them know His goodness. C.S.Lewis describes his own experience this way:

"The Prodigal Son at least walked home on his own feet. But who can duly adore that Love which will open the high gates to a prodigal who is brought in kicking, struggling, resentful, and darting his eyes in every direction for a chance of escape? "


It is the reason why we cannot say Christianity is an "English" religion, nor is it an "American" religion, nor is it a "Roman" religion. We can only say at some point it was at its most influential in England and had a tremendous influence in English culture (which was true in the 17th-18th century) and now it is clearly less so although some remnant of its influence remains. So to put forth the matter, Christianity will always be independent of geography and culture. It is always the same, an awareness of who Jesus Christ really is and the things He did to die on the Cross for all of man's sins, as well as His resurrection in the 1st century. This is what will transform a person and enable him to find his way to God and obtain that relationship with which he was created to enjoy.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The use of Psalm 68:18 in Ephesians 4:8

  For Paul in Ephesians 4:8, clearly there are some changes from the text that Paul is supposedly citing which is Psalm 68:18. Comparing Psalm 68:18 and Ephesians 4:8, it is obvious there are differences. I believe Paul was actually using the LXX but has changed its words for the occasion in Ephesians 4. The LXX version of Psalm 68:18 and Ephesians 4:8 differs by a few words: Psalm 68:18 (it is actually Psalm 67:19 in the LXX): ἀναβὰς εἰς ὕψος  ᾐχμαλώτευσας  αἰχμαλωσίαν, ἔλαβες  δόματα  ἐν ἀνθρώπῳ , Ephesians 4:8 ἀναβὰς εἰς ὕψος  ᾐχμαλώτευσεν  αἰχμαλωσίαν,* ⸆  ἔδωκεν  δόματα ⸀ τοῖς ἀνθρώποις. Structurally you can see the LXX and Eph 4 is similar but for a few words changes.   The first change is from 2nd person (LXX) to 3rd person (Eph 4) with regards to who is doing the ascending in the first line.  So the English Bible rightly translates the phrase to "When  he  ascended on high" versus Psalm 68, " you  ascended"   The second change is perhaps the most radical, wh

Vaughan Roberts, “Same-Sex Attraction – A Battle I Face” – a model of a godly response

http://davidould.net/?p=4388 "In the preface to a new edition of my book “Battles Christians Face”, which features eights areas of struggle, including homosexuality, I write that, to a greater or lesser degree, I face them all myself. Close family and friends have known for a considerable time that I experience same sex attraction. None of the issues in the book define me. As a single man I am celibate, because I believe the Bible teaches that the right context for sex is only in marriage between a man and a woman." I have had the privilege of hearing this man preach before. He has written one of the best books that addresses what the whole Bible is about. In this article though, his courage in fighting sin is exemplary. Homosexuals are not the only ones committing sexual sin and I really admire his boldness.

An Exposition of Genesis 2:24

An Exposition of Genesis 2:24 “Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and they shall become one flesh.” Lots can be said about this wonderful verse. In it, we see the actions of God who created the wonderful gift of marriage. Thanks to God, we humans are capable of creating many things but to conceive of something as powerful as marriage is probably beyond us. Through His creative works, God has demonstrated his goodness and awesomeness. But if we stop there then we will never perceive God’s full goodness and awesomeness.  God’s goodness and awesomeness is not restricted only to His creative works. This verse is ultimately a command, and like all commands we find in the Bible, the one who never fails at obeying them is Christ alone. In the first part of this verse we see that it is decreed that a man shall leave his father and mother . Of this Christ Jesus did perfectly and in doing so, he demonstrated his condescension to us though we