Skip to main content

On the subject that Christians are no different from Epicureans in seeking pleasure

On the subject that Christians are no different from Epicureans in seeking pleasure, differing only in the choice of activities that one chooses to partake


You are right on one point in that we are all beings of pleasure. But to the Christian, God Himself is the pleasure not so much the Christian activities that grant us that (although a Christian should find the community of believers and the preaching of the Word pleasurable). The words from the Psalms are written in this form - "Oh taste and see that the Lord is good" (Psalm 34:8). The use of the language which are usually associated to the partaking of food is deliberate for us to understand this. The invitation is to taste God and his goodness.

I do not mean exactly that the Epicurean acts are futile. It is healthy for Christians to thank God for everything we have been given from music, to food, to the gift of friendships and so on. So in this we share similarities with the Epicurean. The best way of explaining this is that at one point in our childhood, our toys were our everything. But we no longer derive the same pleasure that we used to.

It is the same with God. The knowledge of Him dwarfs out every other pleasure source. You may not agree with this but I suggest two things that points towards this - the first being that one never feels fully satiated on this earth with regards to the good things that we have. All the football, music, arts, travel, and relationships are pleasure giving but never satiates fully.

The second is a bit more counter-intuitive but it is worth asking this question: how did we come to be pleasure seekers in the first place? It presupposes a lot of things. I would suggest we were built for this.

On the matter of the adoption of the Christian religion - this is a subject matter that I have a lot to say but in the interest of brevity, I will simply describe it as such. Nobody actually chooses on their own accord to be a Christian. Theologically speaking, God Himself draws each and everyone out of their own prodigality and make them know His goodness. C.S.Lewis describes his own experience this way:

"The Prodigal Son at least walked home on his own feet. But who can duly adore that Love which will open the high gates to a prodigal who is brought in kicking, struggling, resentful, and darting his eyes in every direction for a chance of escape? "


It is the reason why we cannot say Christianity is an "English" religion, nor is it an "American" religion, nor is it a "Roman" religion. We can only say at some point it was at its most influential in England and had a tremendous influence in English culture (which was true in the 17th-18th century) and now it is clearly less so although some remnant of its influence remains. So to put forth the matter, Christianity will always be independent of geography and culture. It is always the same, an awareness of who Jesus Christ really is and the things He did to die on the Cross for all of man's sins, as well as His resurrection in the 1st century. This is what will transform a person and enable him to find his way to God and obtain that relationship with which he was created to enjoy.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The use of Psalm 68:18 in Ephesians 4:8

  For Paul in Ephesians 4:8, clearly there are some changes from the text that Paul is supposedly citing which is Psalm 68:18. Comparing Psalm 68:18 and Ephesians 4:8, it is obvious there are differences. I believe Paul was actually using the LXX but has changed its words for the occasion in Ephesians 4. The LXX version of Psalm 68:18 and Ephesians 4:8 differs by a few words: Psalm 68:18 (it is actually Psalm 67:19 in the LXX): ἀναβὰς εἰς ὕψος  ᾐχμαλώτευσας  αἰχμαλωσίαν, ἔλαβες  δόματα  ἐν ἀνθρώπῳ , Ephesians 4:8 ἀναβὰς εἰς ὕψος  ᾐχμαλώτευσεν  αἰχμαλωσίαν,* ⸆  ἔδωκεν  δόματα ⸀ τοῖς ἀνθρώποις. Structurally you can see the LXX and Eph 4 is similar but for a few words changes.   The first change is from 2nd person (LXX) to 3rd person (Eph 4) with regards to who is doing the ascending in the first line.  So the English Bible rightly translates the phrase to "When  he  ascended on high" versus Psalm 68, " you  ascended" ...

Paul and the Epicurean and Stoic Philosophers in Acts 17

Now while Paul was waiting for them at Athens, his spirit was provoked within him as he saw that the city was full of idols. So he reasoned in the synagogue with the Jews and the devout persons, and in the marketplace every day with those who happened to be there. Some of the Epicurean and Stoic philosophers also conversed with him. And some said, “What does this babbler wish to say?” Others said, “He seems to be a preacher of foreign divinities”—because he was preaching Jesus and the resurrection. And they took him and brought him to the Areopagus, saying, “May we know what this new teaching is that you are presenting? For you bring some strange things to our ears. We wish to know therefore what these things mean.” Now all the Athenians and the foreigners who lived there would spend their time in nothing except telling or hearing something new. (Acts 17:16-21) (1) Christianity is meaningless to a person if it is classified as simply another school of thought, like the Epicureans or...

Lot, Noah, Shem, the Fall - how they all combine together

In this short writing, an attempt is made to show how the accounts of Noah, Shem, Lot, as well as the events after the Fall serve to powerfully combine to reveal the character of God in those who obey Him and those that do not.  The stories of Noah and Lot seem disparate but the parallels are incredible. The first connection is the feature of “wine” in both of these accounts. The parallels follow the pattern of (A) God’s salvation act (B) The drinking of wine (C) Actions of the Children.  It is easier to see the parallels when they are juxtaposed side-by-side (see picture). The (C) parallel may be harder to observe. Lot’s daughters’ attempts to bear children by their father is in fact the “uncovering of nakedness” prohibited later in the Pentateuch in Leviticus 18:6 -20. The verse below suffices for us to develop our thoughts further: “None of you shall approach any one of his close relatives to uncover nakedness. I am the Lord.” (Lev. 18:6) This ties back to the F...