Skip to main content

Reconstructing Philippi

By and large we have no problems attaining a certain amount of cultural quotience in our 21st century context. For example, we know that football is the number one sport in Brazil, whereas in the South Asia nations (India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh) it is cricket.

We know that Taiwan is using traditional Chinese writing, whereas China uses the simplified.

We know that American English is different from English as we know it. And we know that even within the UK, they speak English rather differently depending on where you are.

We know that the Middle East's greatest export is oil, and China is a manufacturing behemoth, and many similar things.

These are cultural things we can observe about different places. 

But unless we are avid historians, we wouldn't know much about Philippi, Ephesus, Galatia, Thessalonica, and many of these places where Paul writes to. Certainly not in the same way we know football obsessed-Brazil, cricket-loving India, and the differences in which Taiwanese and China write Chinese.

God however, has left us with the book of Acts. 

Photo credits: Marsyas

I was recently taught a healthy exercise which I have now found helpful for us to interpret Scripture. Using the book of Acts (specifically Acts 16) to read about what Philippi was like we can observe a few things.

(1) Philippi was a Roman colony and the leading city of Macedonia at that time (Acts 16:12)
(2) We know that in the economy of Philippi, there were people who made a trade through fortune telling (Acts 16:16)
(3) We know that Roman citizenship was a big deal in Philippi. It warranted that you can never be beaten without a trial (Acts 16:38-39)

And point (3) could then serve our purposes in illumining Philippians 3:17-21:

Join together in following my example, brothers and sisters, and just as you have us as a model, keep your eyes on those who live as we do. For, as I have often told you before and now tell you again even with tears, many live as enemies of the cross of Christ. Their destiny is destruction, their god is their stomach, and their glory is in their shame. Their mind is set on earthly things. But our citizenship is in heaven. And we eagerly await a Savior from there, the Lord Jesus Christ, who, by the power that enables him to bring everything under his control, will transform our lowly bodies so that they will be like his glorious body.

Philippians 3 is a great chapter, where Paul counts various earthly achievements as rubbish. Could it be then when Paul writes the statement "But our citizenship is in heaven", he is referencing to the standard of Philippian society?

There is something greater than Roman citizenship. Roman citizenship may entitle you to certain benefits BUT  our citizenship is in heaven. And from there the privileges are very different from that of Roman citizenship, it transform our lowly bodies to be like his glorious body, far greater than the right to request trial.

And to sum it up for us today, Christ gives us far more than our cultural obsessions. Roman citizenship means nothing today, just like what many of our cultural standards will one day mean nothing.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The use of Psalm 68:18 in Ephesians 4:8

  For Paul in Ephesians 4:8, clearly there are some changes from the text that Paul is supposedly citing which is Psalm 68:18. Comparing Psalm 68:18 and Ephesians 4:8, it is obvious there are differences. I believe Paul was actually using the LXX but has changed its words for the occasion in Ephesians 4. The LXX version of Psalm 68:18 and Ephesians 4:8 differs by a few words: Psalm 68:18 (it is actually Psalm 67:19 in the LXX): ἀναβὰς εἰς ὕψος  ᾐχμαλώτευσας  αἰχμαλωσίαν, ἔλαβες  δόματα  ἐν ἀνθρώπῳ , Ephesians 4:8 ἀναβὰς εἰς ὕψος  ᾐχμαλώτευσεν  αἰχμαλωσίαν,* ⸆  ἔδωκεν  δόματα ⸀ τοῖς ἀνθρώποις. Structurally you can see the LXX and Eph 4 is similar but for a few words changes.   The first change is from 2nd person (LXX) to 3rd person (Eph 4) with regards to who is doing the ascending in the first line.  So the English Bible rightly translates the phrase to "When  he  ascended on high" versus Psalm 68, " you  ascended"   The second change is perhaps the most radical, wh

Vaughan Roberts, “Same-Sex Attraction – A Battle I Face” – a model of a godly response

http://davidould.net/?p=4388 "In the preface to a new edition of my book “Battles Christians Face”, which features eights areas of struggle, including homosexuality, I write that, to a greater or lesser degree, I face them all myself. Close family and friends have known for a considerable time that I experience same sex attraction. None of the issues in the book define me. As a single man I am celibate, because I believe the Bible teaches that the right context for sex is only in marriage between a man and a woman." I have had the privilege of hearing this man preach before. He has written one of the best books that addresses what the whole Bible is about. In this article though, his courage in fighting sin is exemplary. Homosexuals are not the only ones committing sexual sin and I really admire his boldness.

An Exposition of Genesis 2:24

An Exposition of Genesis 2:24 “Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and they shall become one flesh.” Lots can be said about this wonderful verse. In it, we see the actions of God who created the wonderful gift of marriage. Thanks to God, we humans are capable of creating many things but to conceive of something as powerful as marriage is probably beyond us. Through His creative works, God has demonstrated his goodness and awesomeness. But if we stop there then we will never perceive God’s full goodness and awesomeness.  God’s goodness and awesomeness is not restricted only to His creative works. This verse is ultimately a command, and like all commands we find in the Bible, the one who never fails at obeying them is Christ alone. In the first part of this verse we see that it is decreed that a man shall leave his father and mother . Of this Christ Jesus did perfectly and in doing so, he demonstrated his condescension to us though we