Skip to main content

A Gobbet on Mark 4:35-41

Jesus Has Authority over Creation and He wants us to have faith in Him

A Gobbet on Mark 4:35-41

I believe that this passage is written to demonstrate for us the authority that Jesus has over creation. In Mark, early on, he tells us why he is writing this book, Mark 1:1 “The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God.” Up until this point we have already seen, amongst other things:

  • ·         Jesus is the Son of God, through the voice of God after the baptism
  • ·         Jesus’ authority to forgive sins
  • ·         Jesus’ ability to heal diseases
  • ·         Jesus’ authority over demons
  • ·         Jesus’ authority over the Sabbath

Here I believe, Mark is about to show us another facet of Jesus and tell construct for us who Jesus is.

In some sense, the passage here almost parallels the healing of the paralytic in the sense that we see the divine act followed by the lingering question. In Mark 2, the divine act was the forgiveness of sins, and the scribes’ question, who is Jesus such that He is allowed to say such things. In this passage, Mark tells us that he “rebuked the wind” and said to the sea “Peace! Be still!”

Immediately, the wind ceased, there was great calm. And the question in the disciples’ minds was “Who then is this, that even the wind and the sea obey him?”

Sherlock Holmes has a very amusing quote which often utters when solving highly complex cases. It goes like this “How often have I said to you that when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable must be the truth?”

There is only One known Being can claim such authority to rebuke the seas and the winds – the Being that created these very elements in the first place. Being Jewish, the disciples would be familiar with the creation accounts in Genesis 1. Psalms 104:5-7 writes it even more explicitly. Referring to God Himself, “He set the earth on its foundations, so that it should never be moved. You covered it with the deep as with a garment. At your rebuke they fled; at the sound of your thunder they took to flight.”

Could it be then Mark is telling us that the man name Jesus, who had spent the earlier part of the day, and was asleep in the boat amidst the storm, is sharing attributes or possess authority that God possesses? I think Mark wants us to know that it is rightly so. This is hard for us to believe because it goes against everything that we have ever known about our physical material world. That a man can calm tempestuous winds with the mere sound of his voice, ought to captivate our thoughts and attention.

 “How often have I said to you that when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable must be the truth?”

I have heard this passage being used to explain that Jesus is able to calm the proverbial storms in our lives. While I certainly believe He can do that, I do not believe that this passage can be used to provide something allegorical like that. Mark is giving us an eye-witness account, a legitimate piece of history that really did happen. That Jesus really did spend the day teaching his parables. That Jesus really was in the boat with the disciples. That the storm really did happen and that remarkably, Jesus calmed it merely with his voice. If we insist on discussing this passage as a figurative for the proverbial storm, we lose something significant that was etched in history. The Creator Himself entering the boat with His disciples and being present with them.

Why then is Mark telling us all this? What sort of response does Jesus demand from us having revealed his authority over creation?

This I believe will be the application we can draw from this passage. Verse 40 offers us a hint - “Why are you so afraid? Have you still no faith?”

Jesus in the gospel of Mark is being slowly revealed to be unlike any other human being that has ever walked this earth before. And he wants us to have faith in him. Faith in a human being is a difficult thing to do. Even the best of our leaders are all too fallen and we know better than to have faith in them too much. We’ve been down this road before and we’ve been let down many times. Not just from leaders but friends, spouses, family, church friends, and the list goes on. Having faith in a human being is difficult.

But that is what Jesus demands of us - to have faith in Him. I believe by showing his authority over the forgiveness of sins and over creation He’s revealing that He is infinitely trustworthy and that He can lend these credentials to His words.

An ultimately that means having I believe faith in the gospel of Jesus Christ, that He came to die for our sins to bring us into a right relationship with God. Mark, after all, sets out to write the book about the gospel of the Son of God. And the Son of God wants us to have faith in Him.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The use of Psalm 68:18 in Ephesians 4:8

  For Paul in Ephesians 4:8, clearly there are some changes from the text that Paul is supposedly citing which is Psalm 68:18. Comparing Psalm 68:18 and Ephesians 4:8, it is obvious there are differences. I believe Paul was actually using the LXX but has changed its words for the occasion in Ephesians 4. The LXX version of Psalm 68:18 and Ephesians 4:8 differs by a few words: Psalm 68:18 (it is actually Psalm 67:19 in the LXX): ἀναβὰς εἰς ὕψος  ᾐχμαλώτευσας  αἰχμαλωσίαν, ἔλαβες  δόματα  ἐν ἀνθρώπῳ , Ephesians 4:8 ἀναβὰς εἰς ὕψος  ᾐχμαλώτευσεν  αἰχμαλωσίαν,* ⸆  ἔδωκεν  δόματα ⸀ τοῖς ἀνθρώποις. Structurally you can see the LXX and Eph 4 is similar but for a few words changes.   The first change is from 2nd person (LXX) to 3rd person (Eph 4) with regards to who is doing the ascending in the first line.  So the English Bible rightly translates the phrase to "When  he  ascended on high" versus Psalm 68, " you  ascended" ...

Paul and the Epicurean and Stoic Philosophers in Acts 17

Now while Paul was waiting for them at Athens, his spirit was provoked within him as he saw that the city was full of idols. So he reasoned in the synagogue with the Jews and the devout persons, and in the marketplace every day with those who happened to be there. Some of the Epicurean and Stoic philosophers also conversed with him. And some said, “What does this babbler wish to say?” Others said, “He seems to be a preacher of foreign divinities”—because he was preaching Jesus and the resurrection. And they took him and brought him to the Areopagus, saying, “May we know what this new teaching is that you are presenting? For you bring some strange things to our ears. We wish to know therefore what these things mean.” Now all the Athenians and the foreigners who lived there would spend their time in nothing except telling or hearing something new. (Acts 17:16-21) (1) Christianity is meaningless to a person if it is classified as simply another school of thought, like the Epicureans or...

Lot, Noah, Shem, the Fall - how they all combine together

In this short writing, an attempt is made to show how the accounts of Noah, Shem, Lot, as well as the events after the Fall serve to powerfully combine to reveal the character of God in those who obey Him and those that do not.  The stories of Noah and Lot seem disparate but the parallels are incredible. The first connection is the feature of “wine” in both of these accounts. The parallels follow the pattern of (A) God’s salvation act (B) The drinking of wine (C) Actions of the Children.  It is easier to see the parallels when they are juxtaposed side-by-side (see picture). The (C) parallel may be harder to observe. Lot’s daughters’ attempts to bear children by their father is in fact the “uncovering of nakedness” prohibited later in the Pentateuch in Leviticus 18:6 -20. The verse below suffices for us to develop our thoughts further: “None of you shall approach any one of his close relatives to uncover nakedness. I am the Lord.” (Lev. 18:6) This ties back to the F...