Skip to main content

Syncretism - The Christian Idol

Our Young Adults group in church recently started to brainstorm for topics for our Young Adults retreat. One of the topics I proposed was sanctification. There are twofold reasons for this. When people think of the gospel what they have in mind is usually justification alone. But this sadly misses out on another gift of grace that is sanctification. God saves but God also perfects! Without sanctification, all obedience is a reliance on self-effort and hence we are grooming Pharisees rather than disciples.

Hebrews 12:2 powerfully captures this idea. Jesus Christ is rightly attributed as both the founder and the PERFECTER of our faith: " ... looking to Jesus, the founder and perfecter of our faith, who for the joy that was set before him endured the cross, despising the shame, and is seated at the right hand of the throne of God."

The other reason is a personal one. There was a time gap between my understanding of justification and my understanding of sanctification. Why this is so I do not know, but it is definitely observable that I am not the only one. The idea of sanctification seems a lot more difficult to grasp but it is tragic that sanctification often becomes the forgotten gospel and by virtue of that, the Holy Spirit becomes the forgotten God (not that there is another, but to emphasize the point I will use this rather irreverent description. God have mercy)

But the other topic I am proposing, one that I think is worth dwelling a bit more in my own personal life even if we don't choose to do this topic is the idea of the syncretistic Christian.

Syncretism can be loosely translated as dual worship although the actual meaning of the word carries more than just that. In everyday terms, it is simply the worship of God without letting go of the worship of idols. The worse thing about syncretism is the deception it plants in every believer (I am trusting in Jesus Christ, so I should be alright). Perhaps the second worse thing it does, is that syncretism involves God and brings God into the believer's idolatry.

Where can we expose the syncretistic heart? I will try to summarize two points on how this occurs in Christian life:

(1) Syncretistic Christians follow Christ so that God will deliver the idolatries of their hearts
Jesus answered them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, you are seeking me, not because you saw signs, but because you ate your fill of the loaves." (John 6:26)

(2) Syncretistic Christians pray syncretistic prayers and give thanks to God when an idolatrous pursuit seems to be granted. This is captured harrowingly in Saul's speech when Ziphites revealed to him the location of David as he was pursuing David's life
Then the Ziphites went up to Saul at Gibeah, saying, “Is not David hiding among us in the strongholds at Horesh, on the hill of Hachilah, which is south of Jeshimon? Now come down, O king, according to all your heart's desire to come down, and our part shall be to surrender him into the king's hand.” And Saul said, “May you be blessed by the Lord, for you have had compassion on me."
(1 Samuel 23:19-21)

Are these the marks of our lives? We must surely force ourselves this question. Are we following God or are we merely following our idols and using God as a vehicle to grant the idolatries of our hearts? There are surely more marks of the syncretistic Christian that we can identify and this topic is worth developing further.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The use of Psalm 68:18 in Ephesians 4:8

  For Paul in Ephesians 4:8, clearly there are some changes from the text that Paul is supposedly citing which is Psalm 68:18. Comparing Psalm 68:18 and Ephesians 4:8, it is obvious there are differences. I believe Paul was actually using the LXX but has changed its words for the occasion in Ephesians 4. The LXX version of Psalm 68:18 and Ephesians 4:8 differs by a few words: Psalm 68:18 (it is actually Psalm 67:19 in the LXX): ἀναβὰς εἰς ὕψος  ᾐχμαλώτευσας  αἰχμαλωσίαν, ἔλαβες  δόματα  ἐν ἀνθρώπῳ , Ephesians 4:8 ἀναβὰς εἰς ὕψος  ᾐχμαλώτευσεν  αἰχμαλωσίαν,* ⸆  ἔδωκεν  δόματα ⸀ τοῖς ἀνθρώποις. Structurally you can see the LXX and Eph 4 is similar but for a few words changes.   The first change is from 2nd person (LXX) to 3rd person (Eph 4) with regards to who is doing the ascending in the first line.  So the English Bible rightly translates the phrase to "When  he  ascended on high" versus Psalm 68, " you  ascended" ...

Paul and the Epicurean and Stoic Philosophers in Acts 17

Now while Paul was waiting for them at Athens, his spirit was provoked within him as he saw that the city was full of idols. So he reasoned in the synagogue with the Jews and the devout persons, and in the marketplace every day with those who happened to be there. Some of the Epicurean and Stoic philosophers also conversed with him. And some said, “What does this babbler wish to say?” Others said, “He seems to be a preacher of foreign divinities”—because he was preaching Jesus and the resurrection. And they took him and brought him to the Areopagus, saying, “May we know what this new teaching is that you are presenting? For you bring some strange things to our ears. We wish to know therefore what these things mean.” Now all the Athenians and the foreigners who lived there would spend their time in nothing except telling or hearing something new. (Acts 17:16-21) (1) Christianity is meaningless to a person if it is classified as simply another school of thought, like the Epicureans or...

Lot, Noah, Shem, the Fall - how they all combine together

In this short writing, an attempt is made to show how the accounts of Noah, Shem, Lot, as well as the events after the Fall serve to powerfully combine to reveal the character of God in those who obey Him and those that do not.  The stories of Noah and Lot seem disparate but the parallels are incredible. The first connection is the feature of “wine” in both of these accounts. The parallels follow the pattern of (A) God’s salvation act (B) The drinking of wine (C) Actions of the Children.  It is easier to see the parallels when they are juxtaposed side-by-side (see picture). The (C) parallel may be harder to observe. Lot’s daughters’ attempts to bear children by their father is in fact the “uncovering of nakedness” prohibited later in the Pentateuch in Leviticus 18:6 -20. The verse below suffices for us to develop our thoughts further: “None of you shall approach any one of his close relatives to uncover nakedness. I am the Lord.” (Lev. 18:6) This ties back to the F...