Skip to main content

An article for Grace News (DRAFT)

Been asked to write something short for my church's newsletter. I busted the word limit. But this is more or less what I hope to dwell on:

UNITY – THE BY-PRODUCT OF FLESH-KILLING

Recently I have just finished reading “To Kill a Mockingbird”, the 1961 Pulitzer Prize winner written by Harper Lee. Set in the fictional racially-divided Southern town of Maycomb, one particular episode makes for very sad reading. One of the characters in the story, a black woman named Calpurnia was chastised for bringing white children to her black church.

“You ain’t got no business bringin’ white chillun here – they got their church, we got our’n. It is our church, ain’t it, Miss Cal?”

Racial tensions aside, why does this happen? One of the best sermons I have ever heard on the topic of unity in the church, preached by Greg Gilbert, affords this answer – “Unity exists when Self-Regard dies, and Self-Regard dies at the foot of the Cross”.  It makes it very clear to me that each of us carry within us this deadly thing called “flesh” (racially-driven or otherwise) that has the potential to wreck whatever unity we hope to achieve in the church. And if we do not slay that flesh unity will remain elusive. Gilbert goes further to suggest that the only way flesh can be slain is to stand before the Cross and remember who we are. In my own life, self-regard has definitely sought to have its way, and moments like this require the difficult process or forgiveness and reconciliation.

When the Grace News team approached me to write on this topic, they wanted to learn more about my experiences in a Care Group (CG) that is somewhat different from my usual demographic – one that constitutes mostly of young parents, with burdens and cares very different from my own. I offer a few things that I hope may be beneficial in which, I think (one must never presume), I have tried to slain self-regard in some ways. Perhaps some form of cross-demographic unity has been achieved. These are the things:

1) I have found that through my participation in this CG, I have been praying for things that I would otherwise never pray for. This is largely the result of observing our young parents “parent” which is a joy to watch. In line with the mission of our church, I pray for them to be faithful disciple-makers in their household, and I pray for that Christ will reveal Himself to these young kids even at a tender age.
2) I have found God working in me to be more patient. It was a culture shock to arrive in a CG with eight kids screaming and doing a study at the same time. For this I admire our young parents! I think one year on, I now find this a non-issue and am able to do the study (still with kids with screaming)
3) I am now more aware of the challenges facing young parents when it comes to CG participation. It is difficult to come to CG if kids fall ill. It does give me some things to think about especially as CG is such a staple of our church in ministering God’s word to our members.

There are probably more than this space can afford! But I hope these perspectives have been useful in some way. :)

Notes:

1) To Kill a Mockingbird - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/To_Kill_a_Mockingbird

2) Greg Gilbert's Sermon, "Unity at the Cross" is available at St Helen's website over here:
http://www.st-helens.org.uk/resources/media-library/src/talk/53224/title/unity-at-the-cross

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Lot, Noah, Shem, the Fall - how they all combine together

In this short writing, an attempt is made to show how the accounts of Noah, Shem, Lot, as well as the events after the Fall serve to powerfully combine to reveal the character of God in those who obey Him and those that do not.  The stories of Noah and Lot seem disparate but the parallels are incredible. The first connection is the feature of “wine” in both of these accounts. The parallels follow the pattern of (A) God’s salvation act (B) The drinking of wine (C) Actions of the Children.  It is easier to see the parallels when they are juxtaposed side-by-side (see picture). The (C) parallel may be harder to observe. Lot’s daughters’ attempts to bear children by their father is in fact the “uncovering of nakedness” prohibited later in the Pentateuch in Leviticus 18:6 -20. The verse below suffices for us to develop our thoughts further: “None of you shall approach any one of his close relatives to uncover nakedness. I am the Lord.” (Lev. 18:6) This ties back to the F...

Paul and the Epicurean and Stoic Philosophers in Acts 17

Now while Paul was waiting for them at Athens, his spirit was provoked within him as he saw that the city was full of idols. So he reasoned in the synagogue with the Jews and the devout persons, and in the marketplace every day with those who happened to be there. Some of the Epicurean and Stoic philosophers also conversed with him. And some said, “What does this babbler wish to say?” Others said, “He seems to be a preacher of foreign divinities”—because he was preaching Jesus and the resurrection. And they took him and brought him to the Areopagus, saying, “May we know what this new teaching is that you are presenting? For you bring some strange things to our ears. We wish to know therefore what these things mean.” Now all the Athenians and the foreigners who lived there would spend their time in nothing except telling or hearing something new. (Acts 17:16-21) (1) Christianity is meaningless to a person if it is classified as simply another school of thought, like the Epicureans or...

The use of Psalm 68:18 in Ephesians 4:8

  For Paul in Ephesians 4:8, clearly there are some changes from the text that Paul is supposedly citing which is Psalm 68:18. Comparing Psalm 68:18 and Ephesians 4:8, it is obvious there are differences. I believe Paul was actually using the LXX but has changed its words for the occasion in Ephesians 4. The LXX version of Psalm 68:18 and Ephesians 4:8 differs by a few words: Psalm 68:18 (it is actually Psalm 67:19 in the LXX): ἀναβὰς εἰς ὕψος  ᾐχμαλώτευσας  αἰχμαλωσίαν, ἔλαβες  δόματα  ἐν ἀνθρώπῳ , Ephesians 4:8 ἀναβὰς εἰς ὕψος  ᾐχμαλώτευσεν  αἰχμαλωσίαν,* ⸆  ἔδωκεν  δόματα ⸀ τοῖς ἀνθρώποις. Structurally you can see the LXX and Eph 4 is similar but for a few words changes.   The first change is from 2nd person (LXX) to 3rd person (Eph 4) with regards to who is doing the ascending in the first line.  So the English Bible rightly translates the phrase to "When  he  ascended on high" versus Psalm 68, " you  ascended" ...